Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Jim Wells County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 103
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Jim Wells County, Texas totaled $207,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Double Bar H Ranch | Alice, TX 78332 | $16,407 |
| 2 | Gwosdz Three Farms | Sandia, TX 78383 | $15,745 |
| 3 | Schneider Bros | Premont, TX 78375 | $12,598 |
| 4 | Emede Garcia | Premont, TX 78375 | $10,883 |
| 5 | Regina Denise Barker | Alice, TX 78332 | $9,687 |
| 6 | John Cornelius | Premont, TX 78375 | $7,756 |
| 7 | Daniel Acevedo | Mission, TX 78572 | $7,393 |
| 8 | Thomas Dean Carriger | Mathis, TX 78368 | $7,142 |
| 9 | John K Disbro Jr | Premont, TX 78375 | $7,004 |
| 10 | Edward D Wernecke | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $5,547 |
| 11 | Sandia Agricultural Enterprises Inc | Sandia, TX 78383 | $5,322 |
| 12 | Chula Vista Farm & Ranch Ltd | Corpus Christi, TX 78427 | $4,766 |
| 13 | Tatum Cole Weeks | Premont, TX 78375 | $4,606 |
| 14 | Wine Feeders LLC | Alice, TX 78332 | $4,605 |
| 15 | Knolle Dairy Farms Inc. | Sandia, TX 78383 | $4,040 |
| 16 | Botard Ranch LLC | Alice, TX 78332 | $3,424 |
| 17 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $3,226 |
| 18 | Maria Consuelo Hernandez | Alice, TX 78332 | $3,087 |
| 19 | Arnold Trejo | Alice, TX 78332 | $2,937 |
| 20 | Jose Ricardo Gonzalez | Premont, TX 78375 | $2,881 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf