Farm Subsidy information
Karnes County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Karnes County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,739
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Karnes County, Texas totaled $64,994,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Albert Brothers | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $152,647 |
62 | Scott Davidson | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $138,905 |
63 | Ronald J Carter | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $134,896 |
64 | Michael J Reagan | Runge, TX 78151 | $133,834 |
65 | Robert May | Campbellton, TX 78008 | $132,339 |
66 | Vincent Moy | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $130,921 |
67 | Benhardt Elton Ahrens | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $129,766 |
68 | Peggy Janssen | Runge, TX 78151 | $127,809 |
69 | O T Cattle Co | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $127,480 |
70 | Michael J Pawelek | San Antonio, TX 78256 | $127,167 |
71 | Manuel G Davila | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $127,138 |
72 | Terry Tam | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $126,446 |
73 | Herbert Rudolph Jr | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $124,328 |
74 | Ronnie Dale Gawlik | Hobson, TX 78117 | $121,174 |
75 | Harry W Jauer | Runge, TX 78151 | $115,736 |
76 | Melvin Weigang | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $114,488 |
77 | Jose G Villarreal | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $114,430 |
78 | Jimmy Albert Dba Albert Cattle Co | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $113,983 |
79 | James V Yanta | Poth, TX 78147 | $112,931 |
80 | Kopecki Farms LLC | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $110,447 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”