Total Commodity Programs in Live Oak County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 220
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Live Oak County, Texas totaled $666,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herbert Allan Krietsch | George West, TX 78022 | $47,226 |
| 2 | Franklin D Malek | Corpus Christi, TX 78426 | $38,693 |
| 3 | Jeffrey Scott Sautter | Skidmore, TX 78389 | $35,794 |
| 4 | Harold Hudson Wallace III | George West, TX 78022 | $31,338 |
| 5 | Mark Katzfey | George West, TX 78022 | $23,479 |
| 6 | James Pawlik | George West, TX 78022 | $22,419 |
| 7 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $16,592 |
| 8 | Lee Lamar Wallek | Beeville, TX 78102 | $16,359 |
| 9 | Ricky Verlon Maguglin | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $14,447 |
| 10 | Russell Wood | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $13,623 |
| 11 | James Rex Mccelvey | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $13,166 |
| 12 | Alfred Duane Henicke | Beeville, TX 78102 | $12,121 |
| 13 | Dillon Mundorf | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $11,562 |
| 14 | Luke R Goebel | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $11,165 |
| 15 | Schilling Farms | George West, TX 78022 | $10,450 |
| 16 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $9,919 |
| 17 | Anthony S Kaase | George West, TX 78022 | $8,893 |
| 18 | David J Moore | George West, TX 78022 | $7,085 |
| 19 | Michael Wayne Dubose | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $6,771 |
| 20 | Patrick Tam | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $6,598 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf