Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Motley County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 123
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Motley County, Texas totaled $990,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B Brent Campbell | Turkey, TX 79261 | $130,529 |
| 2 | Jeromy Jameson | Matador, TX 79244 | $90,822 |
| 3 | B K L Farms | Matador, TX 79244 | $74,531 |
| 4 | Dillard Family Ranches, Ltd | Roaring Springs, TX 79256 | $73,130 |
| 5 | G & D Farms LLC | Roaring Springs, TX 79256 | $54,803 |
| 6 | Cory Lee Multer | Matador, TX 79244 | $45,430 |
| 7 | Russell Tye Stephens | Tell, TX 79259 | $43,718 |
| 8 | Cottontail Cattle Co Partnership | Flomot, TX 79234 | $35,043 |
| 9 | Matthew Cole Cruse | Flomot, TX 79234 | $28,031 |
| 10 | Darrell Cruse | Flomot, TX 79234 | $27,271 |
| 11 | Stafford Cattle Company Llp | Roaring Springs, TX 79256 | $26,840 |
| 12 | Alfred Kenneth Barton | Matador, TX 79244 | $26,015 |
| 13 | Luke Shannon | Quitaque, TX 79255 | $19,279 |
| 14 | Josh Lee | Flomot, TX 79234 | $18,491 |
| 15 | Bert Whitaker | Flomot, TX 79234 | $15,012 |
| 16 | 2 B Partners | Matador, TX 79244 | $13,970 |
| 17 | Patricia Joan Stephens Trust | Matador, TX 79244 | $12,582 |
| 18 | Hugh Carter Luckett | Matador, TX 79244 | $12,501 |
| 19 | Nathan C Shannon | Northfield, TX 79201 | $11,550 |
| 20 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $11,457 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf