Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 632
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $12,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Guerra Cattle Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $114,746 |
22 | Ana Lisa Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $109,900 |
23 | R E Schiefelbein III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $108,874 |
24 | Ruben Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $98,861 |
25 | Jose F Perez | Roma, TX 78584 | $91,562 |
26 | Triple A Ranch | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $91,253 |
27 | Amclo Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $91,246 |
28 | Dora P Villarreal | Guerra, TX 78360 | $87,714 |
29 | Manuel Izaguirre Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $84,938 |
30 | Ociel Mendoza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $84,261 |
31 | Blas Pedro Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $80,908 |
32 | G L And C LLC | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $79,918 |
33 | Reynaldo Alaniz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $79,244 |
34 | Roberto Saul Margo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $78,216 |
35 | Arturo D Ibarra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $77,268 |
36 | Jaime T Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $75,862 |
37 | Alejandro T Martinez | Linn, TX 78563 | $75,857 |
38 | Jorge D Perez | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $75,604 |
39 | Sixto Rusbel Salinas | Roma, TX 78584 | $72,200 |
40 | , | $70,843 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”