Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 553
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $10,414,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legacy Advance Development Partners Ltd | Roma, TX 78584 | $316,663 |
| 2 | Don Cameron Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $292,720 |
| 3 | El Triangulo Cattle Co | Roma, TX 78584 | $259,897 |
| 4 | Raul Villarreal | Delmita, TX 78536 | $242,098 |
| 5 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $224,279 |
| 6 | F M Cattle Co | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $212,535 |
| 7 | Arnulfo J Garza | Pharr, TX 78577 | $182,132 |
| 8 | Tomas E Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $168,608 |
| 9 | Amandos Beefmasters Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $144,417 |
| 10 | Uvaldo Salinas Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $140,245 |
| 11 | Paula R Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $134,817 |
| 12 | Lauro H & Dora M Salinas Trust | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $134,428 |
| 13 | Exiquio Saenz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $133,175 |
| 14 | Enrique E Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $126,993 |
| 15 | Rafael Ricardo Ramirez | San Antonio, TX 78240 | $124,068 |
| 16 | Blas Pedro Saenz Sr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $118,975 |
| 17 | Guerra Cattle Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $114,746 |
| 18 | Lucio Eden Gonzalez Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $111,196 |
| 19 | Alfonso H Perez | Roma, TX 78584 | $98,493 |
| 20 | Alberto Martinez | Roma, TX 78584 | $97,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf