Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 632
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $12,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Julian J Carrera | Mission, TX 78574 | $68,350 |
42 | David Salinas | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $67,789 |
43 | Ranchito San Miguel LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $63,229 |
44 | C R Pena Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $62,189 |
45 | Gonzalez Bros | Roma, TX 78584 | $60,947 |
46 | Omar Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $60,408 |
47 | 2 M Ranch Inc | Mission, TX 78572 | $59,919 |
48 | Gloria B Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $59,913 |
49 | Maria E Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $58,750 |
50 | Leonel Lopez III | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $58,229 |
51 | Roel R Ramirez Enterprises Inc | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $57,903 |
52 | Miguel A Martinez | Mcallen, TX 78503 | $57,727 |
53 | Noel Arturo Zamora | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $57,468 |
54 | Roel Santa Maria | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $56,634 |
55 | Maria Isabel Alaniz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $56,314 |
56 | Jorge Alberto Gonzalez | Roma, TX 78584 | $55,392 |
57 | Leonel Lopez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $55,052 |
58 | Guillermo Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $53,971 |
59 | Vicky I Flores | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $53,637 |
60 | Placido Pena Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $53,148 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”