Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 271
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,030,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert Lemons | Mission, TX 78572 | $5,503 |
42 | Roberto Saul Margo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,491 |
43 | Eloy Zarate Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,431 |
44 | George Diaz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,285 |
45 | Reymar Cattle Company LLC | Alton, TX 78573 | $5,254 |
46 | Mario A Guillen | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $5,243 |
47 | Everardo Garcia Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $5,162 |
48 | San Marcos Ranch Lp | Mission, TX 78574 | $5,152 |
49 | Jorge Alberto Gonzalez | Roma, TX 78584 | $5,140 |
50 | Roel A Rodriguez | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $5,097 |
51 | Rosalba B Cortez | Falcon Heights, TX 78545 | $5,082 |
52 | Raul Garza | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $5,027 |
53 | Isabel Saenz Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $5,022 |
54 | Ricardo R Salinas | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $5,008 |
55 | Arturo D Ibarra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,970 |
56 | Running E Cattle Co LLC | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,908 |
57 | Osmar Ociel Mendoza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,866 |
58 | Eduardo R Izaguirre Jr | Spring Branch, TX 78070 | $4,799 |
59 | Alberto Ramon Olivares | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,764 |
60 | Celinda S Alvarado | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $4,734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”