Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 632
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $12,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | J M Martinez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $52,173 |
62 | Leonel Cepeda | Roma, TX 78584 | $51,988 |
63 | Ida Lou Perez | Roma, TX 78584 | $51,821 |
64 | Raul Villarreal Jr | Delmita, TX 78536 | $51,070 |
65 | Rosa E Ibanez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $50,981 |
66 | Cesar Rosales | Mission, TX 78574 | $50,901 |
67 | Oscar Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $50,347 |
68 | Clodin R Laurel | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $49,620 |
69 | Enrique E Gonzalez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $47,474 |
70 | Roel Barrera | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $46,558 |
71 | Omar Ricardo Montalvo | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $45,385 |
72 | Maria Oralia Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $45,020 |
73 | Luzelma Rosales | Mission, TX 78574 | $44,832 |
74 | Romeo G Canales | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $43,987 |
75 | Martin Garza | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $43,806 |
76 | Amaro Salinas | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $43,434 |
77 | San Marcos Ranch Lp | Mission, TX 78572 | $42,585 |
78 | Santana Eduardo Carrera | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $42,409 |
79 | Jose Luis Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $42,320 |
80 | Hector Fernando Perez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $41,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”