Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 271
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,030,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Alonzo H Alvarez | Roma, TX 78584 | $4,668 |
62 | Maria Isabel Alaniz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $4,621 |
63 | Eleazar Eden Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,559 |
64 | Lauro H & Dora M Salinas Trust | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,536 |
65 | Doublehook Land & Cattle LLC | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $4,323 |
66 | Thomas D Koeneke | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $4,248 |
67 | Ociel Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $4,092 |
68 | L C Gonzalez Asset Management Lp | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $4,052 |
69 | Octavio Perez Jr | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $4,046 |
70 | Santana Eduardo Carrera | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $3,862 |
71 | Roel Barrera | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,838 |
72 | Rene Munoz Iv | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,796 |
73 | Octavio Nieves Laurel | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $3,763 |
74 | Omar Ricardo Montalvo | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $3,734 |
75 | Rosa E Ibanez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,650 |
76 | Graciela S Requenez | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $3,622 |
77 | Eleazar Elizondo | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,593 |
78 | Ruperto Baldemar Escobar | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,555 |
79 | G L And C LLC | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $3,464 |
80 | Thalia H Munoz | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,418 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”