Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 271
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,030,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Francisco Chapa III | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $2,786 |
102 | Romulo Benavides III | Los Ebanos, TX 78565 | $2,777 |
103 | Marcelo Alaniz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $2,772 |
104 | Larry A Garza | San Antonio, TX 78231 | $2,747 |
105 | Efrain Garcia | Palmhurst, TX 78573 | $2,739 |
106 | Margarito Bermudez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,735 |
107 | Romeo Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,715 |
108 | Roberto J Gonzalez | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $2,707 |
109 | Bernardo Garcia | Garciasville, TX 78547 | $2,706 |
110 | El Rucio Land & Cattle Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,699 |
111 | Gilberto Garza Jr | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $2,692 |
112 | Danissa A Garza | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $2,659 |
113 | Jorge E Pena | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $2,621 |
114 | Dilia Sulema Villarreal | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $2,607 |
115 | Geronimo Guerra Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,593 |
116 | Juan M Garcia | Grulla, TX 78548 | $2,589 |
117 | Roel Santa Maria | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,584 |
118 | Jewel M Peterson | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,556 |
119 | Romeo G Canales | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $2,546 |
120 | Pedro A Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”