Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 333
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,393,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Basilio D Villarreal Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,915 |
102 | Jorge E Pena | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $3,915 |
103 | Jewel M Peterson | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,912 |
104 | Geronimo Guerra Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,866 |
105 | Mario A Guillen | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,866 |
106 | Roel Santa Maria | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,855 |
107 | Veronica Velasco De Cruz | Delmita, TX 78536 | $3,851 |
108 | Everardo Garcia Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,833 |
109 | Dilia Sulema Villarreal | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $3,814 |
110 | George Diaz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,806 |
111 | Romeo G Canales | Lopeno, TX 78564 | $3,795 |
112 | Roel A Rodriguez | Edinburg, TX 78540 | $3,761 |
113 | Rosalba B Cortez | Falcon Heights, TX 78545 | $3,749 |
114 | Raul Garza | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $3,708 |
115 | Isabel Saenz Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $3,704 |
116 | Efrain Garcia | Palmhurst, TX 78573 | $3,670 |
117 | Humberto C Gonzalez | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,534 |
118 | Pedro A Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $3,501 |
119 | Villa Nueva Farms | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $3,477 |
120 | Alonzo H Alvarez | Roma, TX 78584 | $3,440 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”