Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Starr County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 293
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $1,056,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Pedro Laurel Iv | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,572 |
122 | Rodolfo T Garza | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $2,561 |
123 | Cornelio Alvarez Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,482 |
124 | Ociel Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,456 |
125 | Octavio Perez Jr | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $2,448 |
126 | Jorge E Recio | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,440 |
127 | Ricardo Belmontes | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,426 |
128 | , | $2,395 | |
129 | Faustino Garza | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $2,361 |
130 | Larry A Garza | San Antonio, TX 78231 | $2,304 |
131 | , | $2,260 | |
132 | Octavio Nieves Laurel | Mcallen, TX 78501 | $2,248 |
133 | Maria Oralia Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,233 |
134 | Leonel Cepeda | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,153 |
135 | Margarito Alaniz | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $2,146 |
136 | David H Salinas Sr | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $2,141 |
137 | Daniel Oscar Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $2,139 |
138 | Ruben Roberto Guerra | Roma, TX 78584 | $2,112 |
139 | Jorge Luis Lopez | Grulla, TX 78548 | $2,112 |
140 | Melecio Longoria | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $2,105 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”