Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 158
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $6,840,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cotton And Grain Producers | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $529,254 |
| 2 | Cj Farms | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $480,562 |
| 3 | Wesley J Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $443,600 |
| 4 | Chapotal Farms | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $422,950 |
| 5 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $347,275 |
| 6 | My Three Daughters Farms | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $313,312 |
| 7 | Jorge Luis Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $262,230 |
| 8 | G & H Farms | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $262,180 |
| 9 | Rene Gonzalez | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $240,000 |
| 10 | Verne Thomas Vanderpool | Alamo, TX 78516 | $208,787 |
| 11 | Sklarz Farms Ptn | Mission, TX 78572 | $156,009 |
| 12 | M & M Farms | Mission, TX 78572 | $154,376 |
| 13 | Fausto Salinas Sr | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $114,213 |
| 14 | Respondek Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $112,085 |
| 15 | Wilkins Family Limited Partnershi | Mcallen, TX 78502 | $106,802 |
| 16 | Eusebio Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $104,405 |
| 17 | Armando Gonzalez | Edcouch, TX 78538 | $94,939 |
| 18 | Don Cameron Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $92,685 |
| 19 | Crutcher & Avila Inc C/o Southwes | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $89,517 |
| 20 | Scott T Vanderpool | Port Isabel, TX 78578 | $86,818 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf