Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Sterling County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Sterling County, Texas totaled $349,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Copeland Brothers | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $103,576 |
2 | Bynum Ranch | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $35,688 |
3 | Bill J Cole | San Angelo, TX 76903 | $34,145 |
4 | H B Edmondson & Son | Water Valley, TX 76958 | $26,236 |
5 | Horwood Ranch Co | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $25,861 |
6 | John Gay Copeland | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $19,213 |
7 | Ewing F Mcentire Jr | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $15,822 |
8 | V & J Ranch | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $14,684 |
9 | Nine Six Livestock Co | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $10,244 |
10 | Michael C Bodine | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $10,067 |
11 | Harvey Dan Glass | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $9,042 |
12 | Reynolds Foster | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $6,672 |
13 | Trina Beth Johnson | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $5,857 |
14 | Tommy L Wright | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $5,214 |
15 | W L Foster Ranch Ltd | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $5,201 |
16 | Jason Hicks | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $4,762 |
17 | June & Wayland Foster Ranch Partn | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $4,242 |
18 | U Ranch | Abilene, TX 79605 | $3,986 |
19 | Melvin Foster | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $2,592 |
20 | Mary G Beeman | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $1,831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>