Farm Subsidy information
Utah
Total Subsidies in Utah, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,834
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Utah totaled $98,310,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Half Circle Cross Ranch, LLC | Coalville, UT 84017 | $183,263 |
42 | Roche Ranches Inc | Garland, UT 84312 | $182,007 |
43 | Stanton J Gleave | Kingston, UT 84743 | $180,002 |
44 | Warm Creek Ranch | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $174,887 |
45 | Sonny B Munns | Snowville, UT 84336 | $171,815 |
46 | Mt Pennell Cattle Company | Bicknell, UT 84715 | $171,695 |
47 | Sacco Brothers Land & Livestock LLC | Helper, UT 84526 | $171,683 |
48 | Pearsons Ranch | Minersville, UT 84752 | $170,882 |
49 | Jw Cattle Company | Randolph, UT 84064 | $169,209 |
50 | Rodney Carter | Minersville, UT 84752 | $168,878 |
51 | Frank Vincent Family Ranch Operations, LLC | Leamington, UT 84638 | $167,802 |
52 | Dutch Cowboy Dairy | Paragonah, UT 84760 | $166,718 |
53 | Stephen A Osguthorpe | Park City, UT 84060 | $166,509 |
54 | Chew Livestock Inc | Jensen, UT 84035 | $165,428 |
55 | Morgan Ranches LLC | Circleville, UT 84723 | $165,085 |
56 | Barex Dairy | Centerfield, UT 84622 | $163,441 |
57 | Richard K Nielson | Monroe, UT 84754 | $163,085 |
58 | Dennis J Richins | Henefer, UT 84033 | $162,534 |
59 | Norman T Richins Livestock | Henefer, UT 84033 | $162,019 |
60 | Scorup Cattle Co LLC | Aurora, UT 84620 | $161,769 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”