Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Utah, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,729
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Utah totaled $38,193,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Obr Joint Venture | Goshen, UT 84633 | $481,943 |
| 2 | Castle Rock Land & Livestock | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $353,601 |
| 3 | Ace Land & Livestock LLC | Fruit Heights, UT 84037 | $235,751 |
| 4 | Baker Ranches Inc | Baker, NV 89311 | $235,750 |
| 5 | Preston E Allred | Fountain Green, UT 84632 | $235,750 |
| 6 | R Larson Sheep Co | Ephraim, UT 84627 | $235,750 |
| 7 | Platt Livestock LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $235,750 |
| 8 | Lazy 3x Cattle, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $235,750 |
| 9 | Chacon Sheep Co LLC | Loma, CO 81524 | $235,750 |
| 10 | Red Pine Ranches, Inc. | Oakley, UT 84055 | $235,699 |
| 11 | Mickel Brothers, LLC | Spring City, UT 84662 | $234,852 |
| 12 | Price Ranch LLC. | Midway, UT 84049 | $228,833 |
| 13 | Lazy 3x Sheep Company, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $219,564 |
| 14 | Thousand Peaks Ranches Inc | Salt Lake City, UT 84105 | $217,304 |
| 15 | Frank Vincent Family Ranch Operations, LLC | Leamington, UT 84638 | $212,875 |
| 16 | Chivers Ranch Inc | Vernal, UT 84078 | $204,540 |
| 17 | Skyline Sheep Co. Inc | Mt Pleasant, UT 84647 | $198,104 |
| 18 | Bair Bros. Sheep Co. LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $191,510 |
| 19 | Pearsons Ranch | Minersville, UT 84752 | $179,154 |
| 20 | Rudger C Atkin Inc | Saint George, UT 84790 | $177,443 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf