Farm Subsidy information
Utah
Total Subsidies in Utah, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,678
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Utah totaled $108,365,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Obr Joint Venture | Goshen, UT 84633 | $1,101,051 |
| 2 | Castle Rock Land & Livestock | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $770,429 |
| 3 | Mcmullin Orchards, Inc | Payson, UT 84651 | $510,062 |
| 4 | Cherry Hill Farms, Inc | Santaquin, UT 84655 | $477,272 |
| 5 | R Larson Sheep Co | Ephraim, UT 84627 | $410,039 |
| 6 | Warm Creek Ranch | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $407,105 |
| 7 | Rose Land And Cattle | Park Valley, UT 84329 | $407,085 |
| 8 | Box L Ranch LLC | Moroni, UT 84646 | $401,014 |
| 9 | Chew Livestock Inc | Jensen, UT 84035 | $392,499 |
| 10 | Barex Dairy | Centerfield, UT 84622 | $377,766 |
| 11 | Lazy 3x Cattle, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $369,277 |
| 12 | Della Ranches | Grouse Creek, UT 84313 | $363,338 |
| 13 | Ace Land & Livestock LLC | Fruit Heights, UT 84037 | $352,343 |
| 14 | Falslev Livestock Inc | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $347,166 |
| 15 | Magnuson Livestock LLC | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $339,230 |
| 16 | Stanton J Gleave | Kingston, UT 84743 | $335,726 |
| 17 | Orchard View Farms LLC | Payson, UT 84651 | $330,094 |
| 18 | John Henry Hammond | Gunnison, UT 84634 | $327,499 |
| 19 | Preston E Allred | Fountain Green, UT 84632 | $321,636 |
| 20 | Bair Bros. Sheep Co. LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $318,531 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
