Farm Subsidy information
Utah
Total Subsidies in Utah, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,834
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Utah totaled $98,310,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Castle Rock Land & Livestock | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $2,744,785 |
2 | Lazy 3x Cattle, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $481,463 |
3 | Obr Joint Venture | Goshen, UT 84633 | $426,584 |
4 | Mickel Brothers, LLC | Spring City, UT 84662 | $402,439 |
5 | Bair Bros. Sheep Co. LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $395,864 |
6 | Wood Bros | Lyman, UT 84749 | $383,360 |
7 | Baker Ranches Inc | Baker, NV 89311 | $364,259 |
8 | Thousand Peaks Ranches Inc | Salt Lake City, UT 84105 | $357,509 |
9 | , | $333,417 | |
10 | Ace Land & Livestock LLC | Fruit Heights, UT 84037 | $311,930 |
11 | Gurney Cattle Company LLC | Aurora, UT 84620 | $310,289 |
12 | Brb Livestock Co | Sandy, UT 84070 | $303,220 |
13 | Bar Backward C Group LLC | Salina, UT 84654 | $270,530 |
14 | Finlinson Land & Livestock LLC | Oak City, UT 84649 | $270,346 |
15 | Scott Olsen Sheep | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $268,232 |
16 | Dustin M Allred | Fountain Green, UT 84632 | $258,188 |
17 | Richins Brothers | Henefer, UT 84033 | $253,879 |
18 | Red Pine Ranches, Inc. | Oakley, UT 84055 | $249,143 |
19 | Bateman's Mosida Farms LLC | Elberta, UT 84626 | $248,797 |
20 | Dutson Honey Company, LLC | Delta, UT 84624 | $243,676 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>