Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Iron County, Utah, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 111
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Iron County, Utah totaled $4,184,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Holt Farms LLC | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $750,000 |
2 | Dutch Cowboy Dairy | Paragonah, UT 84760 | $500,000 |
3 | Milgro Newcastle, Inc | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $500,000 |
4 | Milknm Farms LLC | Washington, UT 84780 | $341,499 |
5 | Robert S Clark Sheep & Cattle Company | Enoch, UT 84721 | $133,529 |
6 | C & S Jones Livestock Lc | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $119,727 |
7 | Dick Clark Livestock LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $106,322 |
8 | David G Hulet | Summit, UT 84772 | $104,911 |
9 | H A Farms Inc | Parowan, UT 84761 | $86,943 |
10 | Legrande Webster | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $84,324 |
11 | Scott A Stubbs | Parowan, UT 84761 | $71,283 |
12 | Laub Feeding & Cubing Inc | Beryl, UT 84714 | $65,075 |
13 | Roy Adams Farms Inc | Parowan, UT 84761 | $60,842 |
14 | Brent F Hunter | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $55,279 |
15 | Brown Farms LLC | Beryl, UT 84714 | $51,362 |
16 | Dean Lamoreaux | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $50,129 |
17 | Bradley K Guymon | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $50,096 |
18 | Platt Livestock LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $48,675 |
19 | Lyle C Barton | Paragonah, UT 84760 | $47,967 |
20 | Phillip Gardner | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $44,689 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>