Total Disaster Programs in Iron County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 240
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Iron County, Utah totaled $14,110,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clark Brothers | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $968,163 |
2 | Platt Livestock LLC | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $898,097 |
3 | S & W Hall Co Inc | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $748,718 |
4 | David G Hulet | Summit, UT 84772 | $610,861 |
5 | Howard W Jones | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $569,335 |
6 | Scott A Stubbs | Parowan, UT 84761 | $482,265 |
7 | Matthew Wood | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $450,554 |
8 | H A Farms Inc | Parowan, UT 84761 | $436,370 |
9 | Henry M Bulloch | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $410,907 |
10 | Bradley K Guymon | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $299,058 |
11 | L & B Farm & Cattle Limited Partnership | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $291,692 |
12 | C & S Jones Livestock Lc | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $277,558 |
13 | Mbm Land LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $268,207 |
14 | Harmony Land & Livestock Co | New Harmony, UT 84757 | $258,848 |
15 | Dean Lamoreaux | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $219,597 |
16 | Reyes Carballo | Parowan, UT 84761 | $204,961 |
17 | Williams Livestock Inc | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $192,748 |
18 | Brown Farms LLC | Beryl, UT 84714 | $192,724 |
19 | Walking X Livestock LLC | Beryl, UT 84714 | $173,327 |
20 | Burton Livestock | Parowan, UT 84761 | $164,550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>