Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Chittenden County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Chittenden County, Vermont totaled $551,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | S. Mazza Farm, Inc | Colchester, VT 05446 | $421,878 |
2 | Paul Mazza's Fruit & Vegetable St | Colchester, VT 05446 | $26,572 |
3 | June Farm LLC | Burlington, VT 05401 | $18,994 |
4 | Pitchfork Farm LLC | Burlington, VT 05402 | $16,111 |
5 | Janine Ndagijimana | Burlington, VT 05408 | $12,767 |
6 | Burnt Rock Farm LLC | Huntington, VT 05462 | $9,110 |
7 | Jericho Settlers' Farm Inc | Jericho, VT 05465 | $7,106 |
8 | Tropical Edibles | S Burlington, VT 05403 | $6,254 |
9 | Aurora Farms LLC | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $6,098 |
10 | Gabriel M O'malley | Waterbury, VT 05676 | $5,177 |
11 | Tropical Edibles LLC | S Burlington, VT 05403 | $4,204 |
12 | Mack Farms Inc | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $3,274 |
13 | Cottonwood Stables LLC | Colchester, VT 05446 | $3,194 |
14 | Deborah P Conant | Richmond, VT 05477 | $2,357 |
15 | Farr Farms | Richmond, VT 05477 | $1,696 |
16 | Wendy Ordway | Hinesburg, VT 05461 | $1,510 |
17 | Diggers' Mirth Collective Farm | Burlington, VT 05401 | $1,390 |
18 | Stoneyhill Sugarhouse LLC | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $894 |
19 | Mary Beth Whitcomb | Williston, VT 05495 | $885 |
20 | Munyambaraga Shabagwe | Colchester, VT 05446 | $666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>