Farm Subsidy information
Grand Isle County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Grand Isle County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 179
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grand Isle County, Vermont totaled $11,851,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joseph E Sprano Jr | Alburgh, VT 05440 | $103,752 |
22 | Earl F Chamberlin | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $95,360 |
23 | Winfred Howard | Alburg, VT 05440 | $95,196 |
24 | Robert Boumil | Alburg, VT 05440 | $92,189 |
25 | Germain Bourdeau | Swanton, VT 05488 | $91,110 |
26 | Jean J Palardy | Alburg, VT 05440 | $88,259 |
27 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $87,314 |
28 | Phelps Farm Partnership | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $86,300 |
29 | Carl Cobb | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $84,398 |
30 | Forgues Family Farm | Alburg, VT 05440 | $84,229 |
31 | John Quintin | North Hero, VT 05474 | $78,621 |
32 | Leo Henry | Alburg, VT 05440 | $77,273 |
33 | James Hokenberg | Alburg, VT 05440 | $66,703 |
34 | Henry W Robinson | South Hero, VT 05486 | $59,118 |
35 | Heather Darby | Alburg, VT 05440 | $58,913 |
36 | Richard Hallock Farm | Isle La Motte, VT 05463 | $51,636 |
37 | Allen W Hall | Isle La Motte, VT 05463 | $51,098 |
38 | F Dubuque Farm | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $48,128 |
39 | Ray W Allen | South Hero, VT 05486 | $47,673 |
40 | Sandra Duhamel | Alburg, VT 05440 | $47,634 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”