Loan Deficiency in Rutland County, Vermont, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 168
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $1,489,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Theodore Grembowicz | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $85,249 |
| 2 | Harvey Farms | Florence, VT 05744 | $49,760 |
| 3 | Deer Flats Farm, LLC | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $36,096 |
| 4 | Mach Farm Inc | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $35,708 |
| 5 | Woodlawn Farm Inc | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $32,806 |
| 6 | Cash R Ruane | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $30,950 |
| 7 | Book Bros Inc | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $29,690 |
| 8 | Scott W Cleveland | Wells, VT 05774 | $28,761 |
| 9 | Rodney & Alida Tarbell | Middletown Springs, VT 05757 | $27,730 |
| 10 | Claycreek Farm | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $26,602 |
| 11 | Carl Vladyka | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $26,467 |
| 12 | Chambers Phyllis & Andrew | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $26,373 |
| 13 | Stone Fred & Sandra | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $26,320 |
| 14 | Steven E Waite | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $26,199 |
| 15 | Larry & Cristine Carabeau | Tinmouth, VT 05773 | $25,376 |
| 16 | Timothy & Nancy Bryant | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $23,735 |
| 17 | Eagan Farm | Castleton, VT 05735 | $23,506 |
| 18 | Kenneth Torrey | Brandon, VT 05733 | $23,478 |
| 19 | Robert I Ruane | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $23,106 |
| 20 | Pond Hill Ranch | Castleton, VT 05735 | $22,973 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf