Biomass Crop Assistance Program in Virginia, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 65

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in Virginia totaled $2,296,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2021
1Tapscott Bros Logging IncScottsville, VA 24590$384,671
2Mullican FlooringNorton, VA 24273$272,000
3Central Virginia Land & Timber LlMontpelier, VA 23192$201,580
4F & P Enterprises IncAmelia Court House, VA 23002$172,063
5Ashley Logging Company IncMattaponi, VA 23110$131,999
6Powell River Lumber Co LLCAppalachia, VA 24216$119,473
7Reaves Timber Of Virginia IncColeman Falls, VA 24536$108,896
8Cwt IncDrakes Branch, VA 23937$90,637
9Pinecrest Timber CompanyWaverly, VA 23890$61,901
10Charles City Timber & MatProvidence Forge, VA 23140$59,238
11Clinch River Forest Products IncTazewell, VA 24651$53,996
12Donald MedleySugar Grove, VA 24375$53,172
13Calhoun Timber IncAlberta, VA 23821$41,430
14Palletone Of VirginiaChase City, VA 23924$38,170
15C W Moore And Sons LLCCourtland, VA 23837$32,358
16Triple H Contracting CompanyThornburg, VA 22565$28,850
17Shenandoah Hardwood Lumber CompanBuena Vista, VA 24416$26,865
18Virginia-carolina Forest ProductsLawrenceville, VA 23868$26,363
19Falling Creek Log & Lumber CoAshland, VA 23005$23,600
20Augusta Lumber LLCWaynesboro, VA 22980$23,139

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag