Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Virginia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,077
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Virginia totaled $86,387,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Glover Farms Partnership | Suffolk, VA 23437 | $921,968 |
2 | Engel Family Farms | Hanover, VA 23069 | $812,080 |
3 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $754,300 |
4 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $593,122 |
5 | Lowe Brothers | Ivor, VA 23866 | $548,298 |
6 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $506,040 |
7 | Beechland Farms II Partners | Surry, VA 23883 | $472,316 |
8 | Cohoke Farm LLC | West Point, VA 23181 | $381,743 |
9 | Land Of Promise Farms Partnership | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $372,127 |
10 | Virginia Beef Corporation | Haymarket, VA 20169 | $356,054 |
11 | Five Ash Farm, LLC | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $343,342 |
12 | L&g Farms | Emporia, VA 23847 | $340,200 |
13 | Renwood Farm Inc | Charles City, VA 23030 | $319,178 |
14 | John N Mills & Sons | Hanover, VA 23069 | $305,927 |
15 | Rosemont Farms LLC | Courtland, VA 23837 | $304,406 |
16 | Broaddus Farms II | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $301,836 |
17 | J M Newcomb & Sons | Hanover, VA 23069 | $298,475 |
18 | Moore Farms Of Skippers Partnership | Skippers, VA 23879 | $295,368 |
19 | Richard F Hall III | Accomac, VA 23301 | $289,715 |
20 | Creamfield Farm, LLC | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $285,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>