Conservation Reserve Program in Buckingham County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 136
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Buckingham County, Virginia totaled $1,950,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Martha J Buschmann | New Canton, VA 23123 | $107,946 |
2 | Terry O Huskey | Buckingham, VA 23921 | $95,939 |
3 | Jones By The James Farm | New Canton, VA 23123 | $74,605 |
4 | K M Beasley Jr | Dillwyn, VA 23936 | $73,279 |
5 | Hampton Limited Partnership | Dillwyn, VA 23936 | $62,629 |
6 | Longfield Corporation | Norfolk, VA 23508 | $55,269 |
7 | Richard S Ellis Iv Marital Trust | Buckingham, VA 23921 | $51,216 |
8 | Mount Pleasant Farm | Scottsville, VA 24562 | $46,326 |
9 | Philip Fenaux | Dillwyn, VA 23936 | $45,666 |
10 | Frederick F Demaio Jr | Dillwyn, VA 23936 | $40,082 |
11 | Henry E Wood Jr | New Canton, VA 23123 | $39,651 |
12 | John B Buschmann | New Canton, VA 23123 | $37,855 |
13 | Bobby H Bryan | Dillwyn, VA 23936 | $35,104 |
14 | Gloria W Waycaster | Dillwyn, VA 23936 | $34,782 |
15 | Lee Johnson LLC | Arlington, VA 22207 | $33,755 |
16 | Heirs Of C H Anderson | Roanoke, VA 24018 | $32,210 |
17 | North River Farm LLC | Buckingham, VA 23921 | $31,049 |
18 | Claude A Morris Sr | Dillwyn, VA 23936 | $30,699 |
19 | Marital Trust U/w Gene B Dixon | Dillwyn, VA 23936 | $29,982 |
20 | Paul J Holmes | Buckingham, VA 23921 | $27,261 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>