Farm Subsidy information
Caroline County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Caroline County, Virginia, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 38
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Caroline County, Virginia totaled $3,612,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Newmarket Farm LLC | Milford, VA 22514 | $382,730 |
2 | Douglas Coleman Farms LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $192,721 |
3 | D S Terrell Inc | Hanover, VA 23069 | $179,287 |
4 | M S Terrell And Sons Inc | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $134,489 |
5 | Mt Gideon LLC | Ashland, VA 23005 | $107,455 |
6 | Earl W Beazley | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $79,874 |
7 | Terrell Grain LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $59,988 |
8 | Smith Dairy Farm - Charity Hill Farm LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $56,334 |
9 | Garland S Gravatt Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $51,446 |
10 | Wayne Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $50,752 |
11 | Douglas Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $45,363 |
12 | Kathy Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $40,370 |
13 | Stuart T Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $35,104 |
14 | Cory D Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $25,023 |
15 | John Broaddus | Milford, VA 22514 | $24,599 |
16 | Brandon S Terrell | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $21,719 |
17 | Curtis B Broaddus | Milford, VA 22514 | $20,668 |
18 | Coleman Farm, LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $17,460 |
19 | Stover Farms LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $16,061 |
20 | Lynwood D Broaddus | Milford, VA 22514 | $14,788 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>