Total Conservation Programs in Fauquier County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 27
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Fauquier County, Virginia totaled $48,031 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William R. Frazier Family Trust Share B Fbo Wendy | Warrenton, VA 20186 | $13,034 |
| 2 | Clifton Farm Of Culpeper LLC | Rixeyville, VA 22737 | $5,170 |
| 3 | Henchman Lea Lc | Warrenton, VA 20186 | $3,227 |
| 4 | Marshfield Farms LLC | Remington, VA 22734 | $2,877 |
| 5 | Waveland LLC | Marshall, VA 20116 | $2,233 |
| 6 | Va Dept Of Conservation & Recreation | Richmond, VA 23219 | $2,181 |
| 7 | Walnut Hill Farm Group LLC | Burke, VA 22015 | $2,069 |
| 8 | Liselotte Foster | Flint Hill, VA 22627 | $2,065 |
| 9 | John C Bauserman Inc | Orlean, VA 20128 | $1,814 |
| 10 | Mary E Benhard | The Plains, VA 20198 | $1,354 |
| 11 | John D King | Midland, VA 22728 | $1,353 |
| 12 | Blue Ridge Farm Inc | Upperville, VA 20184 | $1,320 |
| 13 | Roberta Jeffries | The Plains, VA 20198 | $1,305 |
| 14 | The Ruther Allen Family LLC | Catlett, VA 20119 | $1,162 |
| 15 | Robert M Jacobs | Bealeton, VA 22712 | $1,006 |
| 16 | Juliet H Mackay-smith | White Post, VA 22663 | $942 |
| 17 | Fountain Hill Farm, Inc. | Upperville, VA 20184 | $759 |
| 18 | Manfred Call Iv | Amissville, VA 20106 | $704 |
| 19 | Crummett Family LLC | Marshall, VA 20115 | $630 |
| 20 | Mildred G Riddell | Casanova, VA 20139 | $615 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf