Loan Deficiency in Frederick County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 33
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Frederick County, Virginia totaled $362,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gary W Mcdonald | Stephens City, VA 22655 | $71,924 |
2 | Long Creek Farm Inc | Winchester, VA 22602 | $42,110 |
3 | John P Good | Winchester, VA 22603 | $36,566 |
4 | Fruit Hill Orchard Inc | Winchester, VA 22604 | $33,901 |
5 | James A Stimmel & Son Inc | Clear Brook, VA 22624 | $20,427 |
6 | Woodbine Farms Inc | Winchester, VA 22602 | $18,820 |
7 | Meadow Brook Farm & Orchard Inc | Winchester, VA 22602 | $18,527 |
8 | Robert E Belford | Winchester, VA 22603 | $15,720 |
9 | Pine Hill Farm LLC | Winchester, VA 22602 | $15,664 |
10 | H G Light & Son Inc | Clear Brook, VA 22624 | $13,535 |
11 | Daniel R Denson Ta Fort Hill Farm | Winchester, VA 22602 | $10,807 |
12 | Roy Mcdonald | Stephens City, VA 22655 | $8,934 |
13 | Thomas E Lefevre | Bunker Hill, WV 25413 | $8,268 |
14 | West Oaks Farm, LLC | Winchester, VA 22602 | $8,119 |
15 | Springwood Farms LLC | Stephens City, VA 22655 | $8,014 |
16 | West Oaks Farm | Winchester, VA 22602 | $7,072 |
17 | Garrett Farm LLC | Middletown, VA 22645 | $4,237 |
18 | Cline's Farm Lp Llp | Clear Brook, VA 22624 | $3,330 |
19 | Clay Brumback | White Post, VA 22663 | $2,517 |
20 | Wayne Douglas Mcdonald | Stephens City, VA 22655 | $2,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>