Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in King and Queen County, Virginia, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in King and Queen County, Virginia totaled $1,370,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Philip Minor Farms IISaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$269,234
2James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$148,973
3Franklin Parker IIIWalkerton, VA 23177$124,367
4Thomas O Longest JrKing Queen Ch, VA 23085$116,322
5J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$99,002
6Beaver Dam Farm IncLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$87,819
7Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$80,394
8Plainview Farm IncShacklefords, VA 23156$58,885
9Hillsborough Farm IncWalkerton, VA 23177$55,135
10Kevin M SchoolsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$51,283
11Hrf, IncWalkerton, VA 23177$40,509
12William Davis CarltonLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$32,363
13Deere Haven Farms IncShacklefords, VA 23156$31,293
14Robert P LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$28,362
15Poplar Grove Lawn Maintenance & Landscaping IncSaluda, VA 23149$22,340
16T O Longest Farms LLCKing And Queen Court, VA 23085$19,880
17Robert F LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$13,172
18John F LongestCenter Cross, VA 22437$11,947
19Eugene C LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$11,291
20Exol Farm LLCCenter Cross, VA 22437$9,250

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag