Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in King and Queen County, Virginia, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in King and Queen County, Virginia totaled $672,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
1Philip Minor Farms IISaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$126,856
2Franklin Parker IIIWalkerton, VA 23177$113,644
3James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$69,814
4Thomas O Longest JrKing Queen Ch, VA 23085$54,552
5J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$44,281
6Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$35,524
7Plainview Farm IncShacklefords, VA 23156$28,264
8Beaver Dam Farm IncLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$26,091
9Kevin M SchoolsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$24,370
10Hillsborough Farm IncWalkerton, VA 23177$23,809
11Hrf, IncWalkerton, VA 23177$19,389
12William Davis CarltonLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$13,872
13Deere Haven Farms IncShacklefords, VA 23156$13,650
14Robert P LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$13,493
15Poplar Grove Lawn Maintenance & Landscaping IncSaluda, VA 23149$9,206
16T O Longest Farms LLCKing And Queen Court, VA 23085$8,451
17Robert F LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$6,468
18John F LongestCenter Cross, VA 22437$5,683
19Eugene C LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$5,052
20Exol Farm LLCCenter Cross, VA 22437$4,325

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag