Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in King and Queen County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 36
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in King and Queen County, Virginia totaled $2,413,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $597,359 |
| 2 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $257,316 |
| 3 | Thomas O Longest Jr | King Queen Ch, VA 23085 | $250,921 |
| 4 | J & D Carlton Farms Inc | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $154,856 |
| 5 | Richard M Schools Jr | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $138,066 |
| 6 | Plainview Farm Inc | Shacklefords, VA 23156 | $131,639 |
| 7 | Hillsborough Farm Inc | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $111,604 |
| 8 | Kevin M Schools | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $100,909 |
| 9 | Hrf, Inc | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $89,015 |
| 10 | William Davis Carlton | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $63,063 |
| 11 | Robert P Longest | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $58,648 |
| 12 | Deere Haven Farms Inc | Shacklefords, VA 23156 | $58,586 |
| 13 | Franklin Parker III | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $53,087 |
| 14 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $44,390 |
| 15 | Beaver Dam Farm Inc | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $35,681 |
| 16 | Poplar Grove Lawn Maintenance & Landscaping Inc | Saluda, VA 23149 | $34,428 |
| 17 | T O Longest Farms LLC | King And Queen Court, VA 23085 | $31,871 |
| 18 | Robert F Longest | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $29,769 |
| 19 | Eugene C Longest | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $22,774 |
| 20 | John F Longest | Center Cross, VA 22437 | $22,635 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf