Farm Subsidy information
Mecklenburg County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,192
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mecklenburg County, Virginia totaled $56,488,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Brankley Farm | Skipwith, VA 23968 | $137,201 |
62 | Peggy S Brame | Boydton, VA 23917 | $134,872 |
63 | Bobby Lee Taylor Sr | La Crosse, VA 23950 | $134,292 |
64 | Mark R Wells | South Hill, VA 23970 | $133,449 |
65 | Edsel J Smith Farm LLC | South Hill, VA 23970 | $129,176 |
66 | G & G Farm Inc | South Hill, VA 23970 | $128,718 |
67 | Wylie Hamilton Farrar Jr | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $125,219 |
68 | Sampson Townes | Clarksville, VA 23927 | $123,597 |
69 | William M Warren | South Hill, VA 23970 | $121,664 |
70 | Milton Ray Allgood | Boydton, VA 23917 | $119,590 |
71 | Johnny Allen Overby | Virgilina, VA 24598 | $118,696 |
72 | Kirk Daniel Gravitt | Skipwith, VA 23968 | $114,279 |
73 | Roger A Overbey | Nelson, VA 24580 | $113,945 |
74 | M L Mcbride Jr | Skipwith, VA 23968 | $112,900 |
75 | Garland Daniel Pittard | Clarksville, VA 23927 | $108,633 |
76 | Steve Clark Farms Inc | Clarksville, VA 23927 | $107,920 |
77 | Allen Franklin Bing | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $105,898 |
78 | Wayne Sizemore | Skipwith, VA 23968 | $104,767 |
79 | David Lowman | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $103,063 |
80 | George L Evans Jr | La Crosse, VA 23950 | $101,229 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”