Total Commodity Programs in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 228
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mecklenburg County, Virginia totaled $1,735,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R Hart Hudson Farms Inc | South Hill, VA 23970 | $153,760 |
| 2 | Opie Farms Inc | South Hill, VA 23970 | $137,771 |
| 3 | Brankley Farms Inc | Skipwith, VA 23968 | $87,787 |
| 4 | Wylie H Farrar Sr | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $77,425 |
| 5 | Proffitt Farms LLC | South Hill, VA 23970 | $76,853 |
| 6 | Lindsey T Warren | South Hill, VA 23970 | $70,854 |
| 7 | J F Leaf Ltd | Chase City, VA 23924 | $65,472 |
| 8 | Wagstaff Dairy | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $60,337 |
| 9 | Farrar Sod Farm | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $55,656 |
| 10 | Clark Farms LLC | Chase City, VA 23924 | $51,345 |
| 11 | James C Hall & Sons LLC | La Crosse, VA 23950 | $42,757 |
| 12 | Mark B Warren | South Hill, VA 23970 | $40,030 |
| 13 | David J Jones | Bracey, VA 23919 | $39,988 |
| 14 | Callahan Family Farm LLC | South Hill, VA 23970 | $38,950 |
| 15 | F Michael Wells | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $38,514 |
| 16 | Mcbride Brothers | Skipwith, VA 23968 | $37,806 |
| 17 | Wylie Hamilton Farrar Jr | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $35,486 |
| 18 | Upton Agsouth LLC | South Hill, VA 23970 | $31,811 |
| 19 | Ronald J Lenhart | Red Oak, VA 23964 | $27,518 |
| 20 | Washburn Farms Inc | South Hill, VA 23970 | $26,225 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf