Farm Subsidy information
Mecklenburg County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 2,192
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mecklenburg County, Virginia totaled $56,488,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Herbert H Overby | Buffalo Junction, VA 24529 | $30,517 |
182 | Christopher David Jones | South Hill, VA 23970 | $30,422 |
183 | F B Kidd | La Crosse, VA 23950 | $30,232 |
184 | Jerry Mcbride | Skipwith, VA 23968 | $30,151 |
185 | Betty Rolfe Upton | Boydton, VA 23917 | $30,104 |
186 | Merle T Allgood | Boydton, VA 23917 | $30,005 |
187 | Richard Robertson | South Hill, VA 23970 | $29,867 |
188 | Charles H Moseley III | Waverly, VA 23890 | $29,622 |
189 | Otha Greenwood Jr | Doswell, VA 23047 | $28,178 |
190 | Gene Parker | Buffalo Junction, VA 24529 | $28,152 |
191 | William T Davis | Chase City, VA 23924 | $27,851 |
192 | James F Bing Jr | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $27,229 |
193 | G E Smith | Chase City, VA 23924 | $26,704 |
194 | Charles W Conner | South Hill, VA 23970 | $26,680 |
195 | White Oak Farms | Henderson, NC 27536 | $26,552 |
196 | Anthony Wayne Bing | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $26,372 |
197 | Lucille A Blalock | Baskerville, VA 23915 | $25,860 |
198 | Walter Goode | Chase City, VA 23924 | $25,734 |
199 | Curtis W Allgood | Chase City, VA 23924 | $25,666 |
200 | Lorene J Tanner | Taylorsville, NC 28681 | $25,515 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”