Biomass Crop Assistance Program in Washington, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in Washington totaled $7,716,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2021
1Hermann Brothers Logging & ConstrPort Angeles, WA 98362$1,141,103
2Johnson Brothers Forest ResourceMissoula, MT 59808$855,045
3Swanson Bark And Wood Products InLongview, WA 98632$499,954
4Jk Construction & Demolition LLCRaymond, WA 98577$455,301
5Vaagen Brothers Lumber IncColville, WA 99114$348,078
6H&h Wood Recyclers IncVancouver, WA 98682$314,111
7Wubben Brothers IncVancouver, WA 98662$313,276
8Sunrise Fiber LLCClarkston, WA 99403$300,000
9Ironsides Custom Grinding IncWaitsburg, WA 99361$262,758
10Local Manufacturing IncAberdeen, WA 98520$240,594
11Pacific Bio-mass Resources LLCChehalis, WA 98532$196,998
12Interfor Pacific IncBellingham, WA 98226$184,538
13Gilliardi Logging & ConstructionElbe, WA 98330$183,904
14Washington Alder LLCMount Vernon, WA 98273$182,625
15Pelland Enterprises LLCPuyallup, WA 98374$179,597
16Mason County Forest ProductsShelton, WA 98584$169,943
17Columbia Vista CorporationVancouver, WA 98666$158,745
18Jeremy WalkerMoses Lake, WA 98837$147,500
19Rainier Wood Recyclers IncRavensdale, WA 98051$130,490
20Watson Construction Co IncShelton, WA 98584$124,298

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag