Conservation Reserve Program in Garfield County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 228
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Garfield County, Washington totaled $2,048,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Klaveano Brothers Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $63,981 |
| 2 | Dutch Flat Angus LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $51,026 |
| 3 | Half Circle R Enterprises LLC | Bellingham, WA 98225 | $49,979 |
| 4 | Ferrell Family Farms | Spokane, WA 99223 | $49,837 |
| 5 | R&r Cox Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $45,460 |
| 6 | Klaveano Ranches Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $42,707 |
| 7 | Dixon Land LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $42,238 |
| 8 | Kirby-zumwalt LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $40,687 |
| 9 | Mcgreevy Ranches Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $40,284 |
| 10 | The Kramer Family Trust | Haines, OR 97833 | $38,459 |
| 11 | Herres Land Co | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $37,752 |
| 12 | Ellis Acres LLC | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $36,498 |
| 13 | Randy R Kausche | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $34,915 |
| 14 | C & S Farms Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $33,495 |
| 15 | James Wolf Living Trust | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $33,148 |
| 16 | Lamont Bank Of St John ** | Saint John, WA 99171 | $33,072 |
| 17 | The Burns Family LLC | Greenacres, WA 99016 | $32,963 |
| 18 | Dixon Land And Livestock Joint Venture | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $32,884 |
| 19 | Leland Land & Livestock LLC | Spokane, WA 99223 | $32,480 |
| 20 | Slg LLC | Spokane, WA 99223 | $31,356 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf