Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Lincoln County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,105
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Lincoln County, Washington totaled $34,950,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Willrich Ranch Jv | Edwall, WA 99008 | $484,535 |
| 2 | The Sheffels Company Gp | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $470,228 |
| 3 | Nollmeyer Farms Joint Venture | Reardan, WA 99029 | $396,092 |
| 4 | Meadowview Jv | Davenport, WA 99122 | $340,198 |
| 5 | Dreger Enterprises Jv | Creston, WA 99117 | $306,959 |
| 6 | Kramer Farms | Harrington, WA 99134 | $304,994 |
| 7 | Gmc Jv | Harrington, WA 99134 | $285,631 |
| 8 | Mielke Brothers Gp | Davenport, WA 99122 | $279,176 |
| 9 | Tanke Joint Venture | Mohler, WA 99154 | $278,733 |
| 10 | Dewald Farms Jv | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $259,588 |
| 11 | West Hills Jv | Sprague, WA 99032 | $251,006 |
| 12 | Haden Farms Jv | Wilbur, WA 99185 | $248,404 |
| 13 | R B K Joint Venture | Creston, WA 99117 | $242,604 |
| 14 | Schorzman Farms Jv | Marlin, WA 98832 | $235,354 |
| 15 | Mckay Seed Farms Jv | Almira, WA 99103 | $224,409 |
| 16 | D & M Farms Jv | Grand Coulee, WA 99133 | $217,524 |
| 17 | Jadan Enterprises Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $216,751 |
| 18 | Kintschi Farms Jv | Edwall, WA 99008 | $211,262 |
| 19 | Neilsen Farms Joint Venture | Almira, WA 99103 | $210,179 |
| 20 | Lazy Y J Farms Jv | Reardan, WA 99029 | $207,766 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf