Total Conservation Programs in Walla Walla County, Washington, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 465
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Walla Walla County, Washington totaled $7,701,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gesa Credit Union ** | Richland, WA 99352 | $342,267 |
| 2 | Zmi Joint Venture | Washougal, WA 98671 | $267,790 |
| 3 | Woodward Canyon Land Co II | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $191,027 |
| 4 | J Hair Farms Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $184,189 |
| 5 | Cline Clyde Ranch | Vancouver, WA 98687 | $170,770 |
| 6 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $153,728 |
| 7 | Lang-mour Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $150,000 |
| 8 | Baker Boyer Bank ** | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $130,347 |
| 9 | Grimm-davis Farms | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $120,208 |
| 10 | Walla Walla Farms Partnership | Sterling, CO 80751 | $116,565 |
| 11 | U & H Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $97,860 |
| 12 | Collard Heirs Farm Agency | Spokane Valley, WA 99216 | $91,631 |
| 13 | Rifle Ridge Joint Venture | Prescott, WA 99348 | $86,960 |
| 14 | Wise-lyon Farm | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $86,144 |
| 15 | Giacomo Farm | Touchet, WA 99360 | $72,100 |
| 16 | Leroy-beaver Farms | Temecula, CA 92591 | $64,992 |
| 17 | Louis Kentch | Touchet, WA 99360 | $62,788 |
| 18 | Martin Cattle Co | Rufus, OR 97050 | $52,531 |
| 19 | Sue M Macdougall Palmer | Boulder, CO 80302 | $50,000 |
| 20 | Fred Hair | Prescott, WA 99348 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf