Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in West Virginia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 168
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in West Virginia totaled $85,696 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lowell T Stout II | Clarksburg, WV 26301 | $4,282 |
| 2 | Mountain State Honey Company LLC | Parsons, WV 26287 | $2,904 |
| 3 | G Steven May | Saint Albans, WV 25177 | $2,714 |
| 4 | Paul E Carbonneau | Hurricane, WV 25526 | $2,701 |
| 5 | Matthew Ryan Byrd | Harrisville, WV 26362 | $2,687 |
| 6 | Linda Marie Teter | Harman, WV 26270 | $2,533 |
| 7 | David L Ketterman Sr | Dryfork, WV 26263 | $2,436 |
| 8 | Rhonna Blatt | Huntington, WV 25704 | $2,333 |
| 9 | Zachary J Comeaux | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $2,169 |
| 10 | Dolan W Black | Harman, WV 26270 | $2,032 |
| 11 | Margaret Ann Stewart | Glen Daniel, WV 25844 | $1,976 |
| 12 | Benjamin F Mckean | Dryfork, WV 26263 | $1,960 |
| 13 | Richard A Hawver II | Ronceverte, WV 24970 | $1,815 |
| 14 | Carol Janice Legg | Crawley, WV 24931 | $1,627 |
| 15 | Robert E Riggleman | Lewisburg, WV 24901 | $1,447 |
| 16 | Randall C Elza | Whitmer, WV 26296 | $1,435 |
| 17 | I Clark Harper | Gallipolis Ferry, WV 25515 | $1,324 |
| 18 | H Glen Haga | Sophia, WV 25921 | $1,146 |
| 19 | Jed Mullennex | Harman, WV 26270 | $1,089 |
| 20 | Carie Ortman | Alderson, WV 24910 | $1,084 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf