Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Buffalo County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Buffalo County, Wisconsin totaled $404,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Karon Olson | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $109,893 |
2 | Senn Brothers Partnership | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $41,720 |
3 | Donald J Rumpel | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $41,618 |
4 | Brad Reuter | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $36,185 |
5 | Ronald Flury | Hudson, WI 54016 | $26,871 |
6 | David L Pfund | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $25,823 |
7 | Jeffrey D Rumpel | Lincoln, MT 59639 | $22,599 |
8 | Dennis Lisowski | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $20,988 |
9 | Elm Grove Farms Inc | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $17,668 |
10 | John Sendelbach | Cochrane, WI 54622 | $15,247 |
11 | Allen J Sobotta | Cochrane, WI 54622 | $10,270 |
12 | Lee A Hansen | Durand, WI 54736 | $8,910 |
13 | Donald Pfund | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $8,549 |
14 | Edward J Sendelbach | Poplar Grove, IL 61065 | $5,571 |
15 | Tcz LLC | Waumandee, WI 54622 | $4,379 |
16 | Larry J Davis | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $3,132 |
17 | Randy Fernholz | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $2,109 |
18 | David A Fernholz | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $2,090 |
19 | William M Baures | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $344 |
20 | Schmitt Brothers Inc | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $246 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>