Dairy Programs in Dane County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 144
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $2,273,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Maier Farms LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $31,563 |
| 22 | Blue Star Dairy Middleton LLC | Middleton, WI 53562 | $31,370 |
| 23 | Tts Kalscheur Dairy LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $31,188 |
| 24 | Jay A Rauls | Deforest, WI 53532 | $28,406 |
| 25 | Laufenberg Farms Waunakee LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $25,938 |
| 26 | Woodland Creek Dairy LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $25,938 |
| 27 | D & K Dairy LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $25,938 |
| 28 | Wagner Dairy Operations LLC | Middleton, WI 53562 | $25,938 |
| 29 | Blue Star Dairy Farms Partnership | De Forest, WI 53532 | $25,938 |
| 30 | Sponem Valley View Dairy LLC | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $25,938 |
| 31 | Zander Family Farm Inc | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $25,938 |
| 32 | Dale Helt | Dane, WI 53529 | $25,938 |
| 33 | Philip M Richards | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $25,938 |
| 34 | Jones Family Dairy LLC | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $25,938 |
| 35 | Prairieland Dairy LLC | Belleville, WI 53508 | $25,938 |
| 36 | Furseth Farms Inc | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $25,938 |
| 37 | R & G Miller & Sons Inc | Columbus, WI 53925 | $25,938 |
| 38 | Kurt Dairy Farm LLC | Deerfield, WI 53531 | $25,786 |
| 39 | Haag Dairy LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $25,721 |
| 40 | Kippley Farms Inc | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $25,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf