Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Dane County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 656
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $119,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L & S Investments Of Wisconsin Llp | Charlotte, NC 28208 | $12,575 |
| 2 | Blue Star Dairy Farms Partnership | De Forest, WI 53532 | $2,326 |
| 3 | Helt Diversified LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $1,074 |
| 4 | Ziegler Dairy Farms Inc | Middleton, WI 53562 | $945 |
| 5 | Jay A Rauls | Deforest, WI 53532 | $938 |
| 6 | Paul Helt | Dane, WI 53529 | $859 |
| 7 | Fertile Ridge Dairy LLC | Mount Horeb, WI 53572 | $854 |
| 8 | Mystic Valley Dairy LLC | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $843 |
| 9 | Wagner Dairy Operations LLC | Middleton, WI 53562 | $835 |
| 10 | Rodney W Hebel | Marshall, WI 53559 | $764 |
| 11 | Laufenberg Farms Waunakee LLC | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $742 |
| 12 | Langer Dairy Farms LLC | Deforest, WI 53532 | $729 |
| 13 | Viney Family Farms LLC | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $713 |
| 14 | Helt Dairy LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $706 |
| 15 | Brian K Rademacher | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $691 |
| 16 | Bryan Rauls | Deforest, WI 53532 | $686 |
| 17 | R & J Jensen Farms LLC | Arlington, WI 53911 | $684 |
| 18 | Mitchell Reible | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $668 |
| 19 | Mark A Reible | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $668 |
| 20 | Skaar Scattered Ac Inc | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $665 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf