Production Flexibility Program in Dunn County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,485
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Dunn County, Wisconsin totaled $16,886,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luanne M Prochnow | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $274,675 |
| 2 | Ron Prochnow | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $274,675 |
| 3 | Henry Thomas | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $245,519 |
| 4 | William Harold Beskar | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $242,670 |
| 5 | Pauline Marilyn Beskar | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $242,662 |
| 6 | Rusk Prairie Farms | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $225,605 |
| 7 | Pleasant Valley Farms | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $212,246 |
| 8 | Alfred J Forster | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $203,264 |
| 9 | Doane Ltd | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $201,287 |
| 10 | Gary A Larson | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $192,687 |
| 11 | Lentz Farms Inc | Ridgeland, WI 54763 | $188,067 |
| 12 | Steven G Harrison | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $172,607 |
| 13 | Luther Grohn | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $163,751 |
| 14 | Virginia Grohn | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $163,716 |
| 15 | Alfa Lawn Farms LLC | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $162,693 |
| 16 | Oak Grove Farms Inc | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $162,101 |
| 17 | Robert Brendsel | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $161,298 |
| 18 | Jaquish Farms Inc | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $153,443 |
| 19 | Thomas D Kopp | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $140,888 |
| 20 | E & L Harrison Entpr Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $139,144 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf