Counter Cyclical Program in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,121
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $6,808,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | K-view Farm | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $13,272 |
122 | Pebble Knolls Dairy LLC | Brandon, WI 53919 | $13,203 |
123 | Dennis Mueller | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $13,181 |
124 | Harley Coehoorn | Waupun, WI 53963 | $13,063 |
125 | Dean J Coehoorn | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $13,063 |
126 | Sherwood Farms Inc | Ripon, WI 54971 | $13,062 |
127 | James Gillett | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $12,947 |
128 | Paul Snider | Eldorado, WI 54932 | $12,826 |
129 | William & Todd Bartz | Pickett, WI 54964 | $12,816 |
130 | Steven Reilly | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $12,810 |
131 | Gordon Stettbacher | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $12,802 |
132 | Jeff Miller | Pickett, WI 54964 | $12,793 |
133 | Jerry D Mouw | Brandon, WI 53919 | $12,752 |
134 | Randall Hefter | Brownsville, WI 53006 | $12,644 |
135 | Hiemstra Dairy LLC | Brandon, WI 53919 | $12,543 |
136 | Fred Batzler | Campbellsport, WI 53010 | $12,348 |
137 | Loron K Bock | Malone, WI 53049 | $12,207 |
138 | Michael C & Kathleen L Weber Revocable Living Trus | Chilton, WI 53014 | $12,204 |
139 | Triple K Farms Inc | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $12,084 |
140 | Michael J Costello | Malone, WI 53049 | $12,041 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”