Counter Cyclical Program in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,121
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $6,808,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chris Shafer | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $90,415 |
| 2 | Ever Green Growers Inc | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $84,410 |
| 3 | Prairie Rock Farms | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $75,147 |
| 4 | Soeller View Farms | Ripon, WI 54971 | $74,918 |
| 5 | Fenner Farms | Ripon, WI 54971 | $69,074 |
| 6 | Edward H Montsma | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $67,925 |
| 7 | Ronald Goeden | Ripon, WI 54971 | $67,722 |
| 8 | Rose-eld Farms Inc | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $66,432 |
| 9 | Brey & Meilahn | Pickett, WI 54964 | $64,358 |
| 10 | William Bartz | Pickett, WI 54964 | $57,099 |
| 11 | Gerald Schulz Farms Inc | Ripon, WI 54971 | $56,894 |
| 12 | Willis Bros Farm Partnership Llp | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $53,861 |
| 13 | David Marchant | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $48,821 |
| 14 | Phillip Majerus | Lomira, WI 53048 | $48,695 |
| 15 | Kathryn E Montsma | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $45,281 |
| 16 | Pinch Farms Inc | Brandon, WI 53919 | $44,405 |
| 17 | Chris Jay Schumacher | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $43,983 |
| 18 | Homeland Dairy Llp | Brandon, WI 53919 | $42,625 |
| 19 | Rickland Farms Inc | Eldorado, WI 54932 | $42,052 |
| 20 | Cottonwood Creek Farms Inc | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $39,162 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf