Market Loss Assistance Program in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,527
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $18,750,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Prairie Rock Farms | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $160,756 |
2 | Rose-eld Farms Inc | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $154,099 |
3 | Edward H Montsma | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $146,388 |
4 | Brey & Meilahn | Pickett, WI 54964 | $146,316 |
5 | Phillip Majerus | Lomira, WI 53048 | $141,022 |
6 | Ever Green Growers Inc | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $139,888 |
7 | Rickland Farms Inc | Eldorado, WI 54932 | $128,283 |
8 | Shafer's Acres | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $122,570 |
9 | Fenner Farms | Ripon, WI 54971 | $118,834 |
10 | Willis Bros Farm Partnership Llp | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $112,264 |
11 | Spergers Bona Vita Farms | Waupun, WI 53963 | $111,605 |
12 | Allen L Abel | Eden, WI 53019 | $104,964 |
13 | Cottonwood Creek Farms Inc | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $102,637 |
14 | Ronald Goeden | Ripon, WI 54971 | $102,543 |
15 | Gerald Schulz Farms Inc | Ripon, WI 54971 | $96,928 |
16 | Chris Jay Schumacher | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $89,335 |
17 | David Marchant | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $89,007 |
18 | David C Schultz | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $85,045 |
19 | Ruedinger Farms Inc | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $84,246 |
20 | Spirit Enterprise Inc | Fond Du Lac, WI 54936 | $80,803 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>