Counter Cyclical Program in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 206
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $2,288,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rossi Grain Farms | Bristol, WI 53104 | $165,438 |
2 | R & C Hawkins Farms | Bristol, WI 53104 | $158,276 |
3 | Elmer Weis | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $80,764 |
4 | Jay R Sorensen | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $71,794 |
5 | J Boilini Farms Inc | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $66,119 |
6 | Reynolds Farm Partnership | Genoa City, WI 53128 | $60,028 |
7 | William Walker | Bristol, WI 53104 | $48,040 |
8 | Brent Nelson | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $44,906 |
9 | Gary Nelson Farms Inc | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $44,904 |
10 | Gitzlaff Farms Inc | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $43,996 |
11 | Mark K Edquist | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $43,834 |
12 | Charles Tunkieicz Farm Inc | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $43,561 |
13 | Bart Ament | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $42,602 |
14 | James Rogers | Bristol, WI 53104 | $32,993 |
15 | Emil M Mravec Revocable Trust Dated 4-15-2009 | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $30,931 |
16 | William Fliess | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $29,598 |
17 | Leland & Bernelda Stohr Revocable | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $29,353 |
18 | John Kevek Farms Inc | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $28,979 |
19 | Robert F Fliess Jr | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $28,057 |
20 | Jerome N Fliess | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $27,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>