Total Disaster Programs in Monroe County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 969
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Monroe County, Wisconsin totaled $9,931,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dandy Creek Cranberries LLC | Necedah, WI 54646 | $258,204 |
2 | Bear Creek Cranberry LLC | Tomah, WI 54660 | $215,204 |
3 | Tainter Summit Ridge Ginseng Farm | Ontario, WI 54651 | $206,891 |
4 | North Tomah Cranberry Co Inc | Tomah, WI 54660 | $186,994 |
5 | Miles Schroeder | Warrens, WI 54666 | $125,707 |
6 | Aberdeen Pastures Angus Farms LLC | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $105,989 |
7 | Kelly D Rudd | Tomah, WI 54660 | $102,017 |
8 | Bohm Cranberry Corp | Tomah, WI 54660 | $100,000 |
9 | David M Wagner | Tomah, WI 54660 | $96,874 |
10 | Zastoupil Farms Llp | Tomah, WI 54660 | $96,009 |
11 | Jensen Cranberry Bogs Inc | Warrens, WI 54666 | $94,192 |
12 | Gregory E Selbrede | Sparta, WI 54656 | $91,173 |
13 | Van Kow Cranberries LLC | Warrens, WI 54666 | $87,206 |
14 | Wildcat Bluff Cranberry Company L | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $86,765 |
15 | Daniel J Frei | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $85,602 |
16 | Draeger Cranberry Co Inc | Warrens, WI 54666 | $82,528 |
17 | A&k Alexander Cranberry Co LLC | Tomah, WI 54660 | $82,003 |
18 | Paul Hammes | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $81,279 |
19 | Raymond R Berent | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $80,786 |
20 | Hungry Run Cranberry LLC | Warrens, WI 54666 | $79,796 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>